Sunday, December 4, 2016

The Running Game: Week Thirteen No Suprises

I guess that's what happens when hedging all picks based on the benchmarks. But I am also making careful picks based on the work I did over Week Eleven. I'm not sure if the Upset Rates line up as well this week as they did last week, but the data does not seem to be completely unreliable.


CalcBenchThoughts & Gut pick (2015-16 Calc pick success rate vs. Underdog upset rate)Winner
DAL at MINMINDALGODDAMNIT, COWBOYS. They're on fire, DAL (64% vs. 27%)DAL
DEN at JAXDENDENThe Home team just isn't good enough to beat DEN (72% vs. 14%)DEN
KC at ATLKCSplitGoing with Matty Ice & their upset rate at home, ATL (81% vs. 51%)KC
HOU at GBGBGBI really, really don't see Houston beating PACKERS! (60% vs. 15%)GB
PHI at CINPHISplitWentz is the rookie that isn't ready for primetime, CIN (42% vs. 14%)CIN
DET at NONOSplitThe Saints' success rate has nothing on upsets by DET (67% vs. 48%)DET
SF at CHICHISplitIn the battle of the worst, the line is SF (41% vs. 21%)CHI
LA at NENENEThe Rams' upset rate isn't enough to beat NE (80% vs. 37%)NE
MIA at BALBALSplitMiami is definitely turning my head, MIA (53% vs. 36%)BAL
BUF at OAKBUFOAKLET'S GO OAK-LAND! OAK (53% vs. 16%)OAK
TB at SDTBSDHedge time, SD (60% vs. 31%)TB
WAS at ARIARISplitI think the Cards can hold onto this one ARI (65% vs. 34%)ARI
NYG at PITPITSplitLooking at that Upset Rate, I'm sticking with PIT (68% vs. 10%)PIT
CAR at SEASEASEAI'm sorry, Carolina, it's not happening this year SEA (54% vs. 49%)...
IND at NYJNYJINDBoth rates are leading me to hedge with IND (45% vs. 26%)...

With all the attention on my Gut picks, I only just now noticed how well my Official calculation did this week. The tie-breaker game is tomorrow night. That's about the only interesting thing about Colts at Jets.

No comments:

Post a Comment